Academic governance

Independent editorial judgment supported by international subject expertise.

Journal leadership

Academic leadership

Editorial expertise with clear academic accountability

Our academic leadership supports subject quality, ethical practice, and the editorial independence of each journal. Final manuscript decisions remain with the responsible journal editors.

01

Subject leadership

Guidance on journal scope and emerging research directions.

02

Editorial standards

Support for rigorous review, ethical practice, and transparent decisions.

03

Academic independence

Separation of editorial judgment from commercial or personal influence.

Journal leadership

Editors leading our specialist journals

Each journal maintains a broader international editorial board. The links below lead to the full, journal-specific board records on the publishing platform.

CTMCMathematical computing
Davood Khojasteh Salkuyeh

Davood Khojasteh Salkouyeh

University of Guilan, Iran

Editorial governance

How academic oversight supports reliable publication

01

Scope and relevance

Journal leaders define a coherent scholarly remit and assess whether submissions contribute meaningfully to that remit.

02

Qualified peer review

Editors select reviewers with appropriate subject expertise and manage competing interests responsibly.

03

Reasoned decisions

Acceptance, revision, or rejection decisions should be supported by the manuscript record and communicated professionally.

04

Integrity after publication

Editors support corrections, expressions of concern, and retractions when the reliability of the scholarly record requires action.

Work with us

Interested in editorial or reviewing service?

Academic appointments are based on subject expertise, research standing, professional conduct, and the needs of each journal.

Contact the press